Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld21 February 20253349453

Blossom Tree Camping , Littlefell Lane, LANCASTER, LA2 0RF

without planning permission, the carrying out of Development associated with camping activities on the Land, including hard standings and tracks, electric hook up points, standalone solar panels, waste disposal facility, modified containers to form utility blocks, outbuildings/structures and alterations to land levels to create terracing. (the Development)

Authority
Lancaster City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Savage M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged in the notice occurred as a matter of fact (ground (b))
  • Whether the matters stated in the notice, if they occurred, constitute a breach of planning control (ground (c))
  • Whether, at the date the notice was issued, enforcement action was time-barred (ground (d))

What decided it

The appellant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the disputed structures and works either had not occurred, did not constitute development requiring planning permission, or were immune from enforcement through the passage of time.

Judgments cited: Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.