Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 April 20253349838

5 Chigwell Road, South Woodford, Redbridge, London, E18 1LR

Planning appeal 3349838 at 5 Chigwell Road, South Woodford, Redbridge, London, E18 1LR (London Borough of Redbridge) was allowed on 3 April 2025 by Inspector Kempton N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the disputed conditions are necessary and reasonable having regard to the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to noise and disturbance.

creation of roof terrace at first floor level , installation of privacy screen, detached rear outbuilding, paved patio area, cycle store, without complying with conditions 2, 5 and 6 attached to planning permission Ref 0716/24, dated 10th May 2024

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Change of use
Inspector
Kempton N
Postcode
E18 1LR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed conditions are necessary and reasonable having regard to the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and on the living conditions of neighbouring residents with particular regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The location of the outbuilding at the rear of the property in an area of residential character, close to residential gardens and away from active frontage, means that allowing separate commercial use would unreasonably increase activity and noise and disturbance to neighbouring residents, outweighing any minimal benefit to retail vitality.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP26Policy LP10

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

391 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Redbridge

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice varied and upheld23 September 20263353209
    3 Highbury Gardens, Ilford, IG3 8AB
  2. Dismissed6 May 20266000914
    12 Cavendish Gardens, Ilford, IG1 3EA
  3. Dismissed21 April 20266002749
    32 Cowley Road, Cranbrook, Ilford, IG1 3JL
  4. Split Decision10 April 20266003172
    159 Ilford Lane, Ilford, IG1 2RR
  5. Dismissed25 March 20266001655
    10 Belgrave Road, Ilford, Essex, IG1 3AW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.