Planning appeal decision
Land North of Mucklestone Wood Lane / East of Rock Lane, Loggerheads, Market Drayton, Staffordshire, TF9 4RJ
Planning appeal 3350245 at Land North of Mucklestone Wood Lane / East of Rock Lane, Loggerheads, Market Drayton, Staffordshire, TF9 4RJ (Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council) was allowed on 29 January 2025 by Inspector Hockenhull H, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site would be an appropriate location for housing development, with regard to its accessibility to facilities and services, including public transport.
Outline planning application for the erection of up to 150 dwellings, associated infrastructure and open space (with all matters reserved except for the details of the main site access)
- Authority
- Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hockenhull H
- Postcode
- TF9 4RJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site would be an appropriate location for housing development, with regard to its accessibility to facilities and services, including public transport
- The effect of the appeal proposal on the landscape character and the visual amenity of the appeal site and surrounding area
- The effect of the appeal proposal on the special architectural or historic interest of White House Farm, a grade II listed building and designated heritage asset, with particular regard to its setting
- The effect of the appeal proposal on the supply of the best and most versatile agricultural land (BMV)
- Whether the Council can demonstrate an appropriate housing land supply given the requirements set out in national policy
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance, and the substantial benefits of housing delivery outweighed the limited landscape and less-than-substantial heritage harm identified.
The substantial weight attributable to market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate/limited weight benefits (open space, biodiversity, economic and highway contributions), outweighed the moderate harm to landscape character/visual amenity and the less-than-substantial heritage harm at the lower end of the scale, so the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits under the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H1Policy ASP6Policy G2Policy LNPS1Policy SP3Policy CSP1Policy CSP4Policy N17Policy N19Policy LNPP1Policy LNPT1Policy LNPN12Policy LV1Policy LV2Policy LW53
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 187Paragraph 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed1 May 20266004959Land Adj Beechcroft, Hill Chorlton, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 5DS
- Dismissed1 April 20266002380Lakeside Manor, Manor Road, Madeley, Crewe, CW3 9PT
- Dismissed30 March 20266003241Part of Field 3373, Wesleyan Road, Ashley, Market Drayton, Shropshire, TF9 4JT
- Allowed23 March 20266002046Land Between Lymes Road and Whitmore Road, Butterton, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 4DT
- Allowed18 March 20266001959Land South of Carr Lane Farmhouse, Carr Lane Farm, Carr Lane, Audley, Staffordshire, ST7 8DP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®