Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 January 20253351427

476 Ripple Road, Barking, IG11 9RY

Planning appeal 3351427 at 476 Ripple Road, Barking, IG11 9RY (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 28 January 2025 by Inspector Forrett C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

the construction of a 2 bedroom dwelling to land adjoining 476 Ripple Road

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Forrett C
Postcode
IG11 9RY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on highway safety with particular regard to car parking

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance of the area and the lack of suitable parking provision significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the policies in the Framework as a whole.

The benefits of housing delivery were limited and were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to character and appearance and the lack of parking provision, making the proposal unsustainable development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1 of The London Plan (2021)Policy D4 of The London Plan (2021)Policy SP2 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Local Plan 2020-2037Policy DMD1 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Local Plan 2020-2037Policy T6 of the London PlanPolicy DMT2 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Local Plan 2020-2037
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

341 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  2. Notice upheld17 March 20263332937
    56 Kings Avenue, Romford, RM6 6BB
  3. Notice upheld16 March 20263332931
    532 Becontree Avenue, Dagenham, RM8 3HR
  4. Dismissed12 March 20266001227
    8A Neville Gardens, Dagenham, RM8 3QT
  5. Dismissed27 February 20266001528
    65, Upney Lane, Barking, IG11 9LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.