Planning appeal decision
Land off Foxborough Lane, Minster, CT12 4AH
Planning appeal 3351846 at Land off Foxborough Lane, Minster, CT12 4AH (Thanet District Council) was dismissed on 10 February 2025 by Inspector Wallis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the landscape.
an outline planning application for the demolition of no. 97 Tothill Street and erection of up to 115 residential dwellings (including affordable housing), introduction of structural planting and landscaping, public open space, sustainable urban drainage system and associated works (all matters reserved except for access)
- Authority
- Thanet District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wallis D
- Postcode
- CT12 4AH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the landscape
- the effect of the development upon the resource of best and most versatile agricultural land
- whether or not suitable and safe pedestrian access would be provided, to avoid residual highway effects
- the effects upon local social infrastructure
- whether or not an adverse effect on integrity would occur to the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay Special Protection Area and/or the Sandwich Bay and Hacklinge Marshes Site of Special Scientific Interest
What decided it
The unacceptable risk to pedestrian safety arising from unsafe crossing points and a narrow onward footway, combined with harm to landscape character and unjustified loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the scheme.
The harms of the proposed development to landscape character, best and most versatile agricultural land, and pedestrian safety were found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, economic benefits, and open space/BNG/drainage provision, such that the balance tipped against the proposal despite the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP24Policy SP26Policy QD02Policy E16Policy SP43Policy SP44Policy TP02Policy SP23Policy SP41Policy SP29
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 187Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Thanet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed15 June 2026600433017 Cliftonville Avenue, Ramsgate, CT12 6DS
- Dismissed27 November 20253369010The Lodge, Sacketts Hill, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 2QS
- Allowed10 November 20253365966Disused Railway Line, Tivoli Road, Margate, Kent, CT9 4BZ
- Allowed4 November 2025336786314 North Foreland Road, Broadstairs, CT10 3NN
- Allowed27 October 20253370093Parkside, 54 - 56 Dane Road, Margate, Kent, CT9 2AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®