Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 May 20253354845

27 Wayland Approach, Adel, Leeds, LS16 8JF

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bartlett R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The solid, chunky, high fencing enclosing the decking is excessive in form, height, width and massing, causing significant adverse harm to the open and verdant character of the area that cannot be adequately mitigated by proposed hedging and is not outweighed by the benefit of a more usable garden space.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Core Strategy (as amended 2019), Saved Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (review 2006), Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (review 2006), Policy HDG1 of the Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.