Planning appeal decision
27 Wayland Approach, Adel, Leeds, LS16 8JF
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Bartlett R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The solid, chunky, high fencing enclosing the decking is excessive in form, height, width and massing, causing significant adverse harm to the open and verdant character of the area that cannot be adequately mitigated by proposed hedging and is not outweighed by the benefit of a more usable garden space.
Framework references: 135
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Core Strategy (as amended 2019), Saved Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (review 2006), Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (review 2006), Policy HDG1 of the Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2012)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®