Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 April 20253354873

Land North of Rushett Lane, , Malden Rushett, , Chessington, KT9 2NG

installation of a battery energy storage system with associated infrastructure and works

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Willis S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial weight given to the scheme's contribution to energy security, low carbon energy transition, and climate change mitigation clearly outweighed the moderate harms to Green Belt openness and character and appearance, establishing very special circumstances.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CS3, Policy DM5, Policy D3, Policy CS8, Policy DM10, Policy G6, Policy DM6, Policy G2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.