Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld13 October 20253355187

387 BIRMINGHAM NEW RAOD, DUDLEY, DY1 4SJ

Without planning permission and within the last four years the carrying out of development comprising of a roof extension (the Roof Extension)

Authority
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Dignan P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether planning permission should be granted for roof works carried out, comprising a hip-to-gable roof extension incorporating a rear dormer, on the ground that the development is permitted development under Class B of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015

What decided it

The development as built fails to accord with development plan policies on character and appearance due to its dominant, top-heavy appearance and use of unsympathetic materials on the side elevation, which is discordant in the street scene.

Plan policies cited: Black Country Core Strategy (2011) Policy ENV2, Black Country Core Strategy (2011) Policy ENV3, Dudley Borough Development Strategy (2017) Policy L1, Dudley Borough Development Strategy (2017) Policy S6, Residential Design Guide SPD (2023)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.