Planning appeal decision
Double Arches Business Park Eastern Way, Heath And Reach, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9LF
Planning appeal 3355231 at Double Arches Business Park Eastern Way, Heath And Reach, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9LF (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 8 April 2025 by Inspector Owen A, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policies.
the development of additional on-site facilities and buildings for the maintenance and repair of fairground and associated vehicles on the site; two existing buildings of similar size, one B class and one for Travelling Show People use will swap use classes; 10 caravans of residential use by quarry workers to be removed
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Owen A
- Postcode
- LU7 9TB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and development plan policies
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area beyond a settlement envelope
- whether the development would provide acceptable living conditions for its future occupiers with respect to the layout of the plots
- the effect on highway safety
- would the harms to the Green Belt, and any other harms, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The Green Belt and other identified harms were not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances were not established.
Substantial harm to the Green Belt and significant harm to character and appearance, living conditions and highway safety outweighed the significant weight given to the lack of alternative sites and other considerations, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- SP4SP7EE5HQ1H8H7T2T1EE2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed9 September 202660109292 Palma Close, Dunstable, LU6 1BU
- Dismissed8 September 20266009181Bracken Ley, London Road, Houghton Conquest, MK45 3LP
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®