Planning appeal decision
Gateways, Esholt Avenue, Guiseley, Leeds, LS20 8AX
Planning appeal 3355898 at Gateways, Esholt Avenue, Guiseley, Leeds, LS20 8AX (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 3 April 2025 by Inspector Walker R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed buildings or their setting, known as Park Gate House and the Gate Lodge and Gate Piers to Park Gate House, and any features of special architectural or historic interest which they possess and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Guiseley Conservation Area including from any effects of the proposal on trees.
erection of detached annexe; new hard standing and associated landscaping; restoration works to existing gates
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Walker R
- Postcode
- LS20 8AX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve the Grade II listed buildings or their setting, known as Park Gate House and the Gate Lodge and Gate Piers to Park Gate House, and any features of special architectural or historic interest which they possess and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Guiseley Conservation Area including from any effects of the proposal on trees
- Whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for Biodiversity Net Gain
- Whether future occupiers of the proposed development would have acceptable living conditions with particular reference to outlook, light and external amenity space
- The effects of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring property with particular reference to overlooking
What decided it
The less than substantial but nevertheless great weight harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets (the listed buildings and conservation area) was not outweighed by the small public benefits of the proposal, and clear and convincing justification for the harm had not been provided.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GP5Policy LD1Policy N19Policy G9Policy P10Policy P11Policy P12Policy Land 2Policy H2Policy BD5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 214Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed27 October 20266012772Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
- Dismissed20 October 20266012588Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
- Dismissed19 October 202660120225 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
- Dismissed16 October 20266010100Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
- Dismissed15 October 20266010414Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®