Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision1 October 20253356099

69 Selborne Grove, Keighley, BD21 1HP

without planning permission, erection of a single storey rear extension, with canopy, walling to the rear boundary of the property, front and rear dormer window roof extensions and hard surface to the front of the property

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Rafferty C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on flood risk and drainage

What decided it

The rear canopy, boundary walling, and hard surfacing cause visual harm to character and appearance and create drainage concerns that outweigh any functional benefits, whereas the rear extension and dormer windows are proportionate and consistent with the varied streetscape.

Plan policies cited: Policy DS1, Policy DS3, Policy DS5, Policy SC9, Policy EN7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.