Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision1 October 20253356273

71 Selborne Grove, KEIGHLEY, BD21 1HP

without planning permission, erection of a single storey rear extension, with canopy, walling to the rear boundary of the property, front and rear dormer window roof extensions, impermeable hard surface to the front of the property and an outbuilding to the front of the property

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Rafferty C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on flood risk and drainage

What decided it

The rear canopy, boundary walling, outbuilding and hard surfacing caused visual harm to character and appearance and failed to provide adequate drainage provision, contrary to development plan policies and the Framework.

Plan policies cited: Policy DS1, Policy DS3, Policy DS5, Policy SC9, Policy EN7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.