Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 April 20253356347

21 Brudenell View, Hyde Park, Leeds, LS6 1HG

Planning appeal 3356347 at 21 Brudenell View, Hyde Park, Leeds, LS6 1HG (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 14 April 2025 by Inspector Tinsley F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to crime, anti-social behaviour, noise and other disturbance.

‘a change of use from domestic residence (C3) to House in Multiple Occupation (C4), including the addition of front and rear dormers and the conversion of basement to habitable accommodation and external changes.’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Tinsley F
Postcode
LS6 1HG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to crime, anti-social behaviour, noise and other disturbance.
  • The effect of the proposed development on the sustainability of the local community, with particular regard to housing and population mix in the area.

What decided it

The proposal would result in unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through increased noise and disturbance from multiple unrelated occupants, and would further exacerbate the existing over-concentration of HMOs in the area, undermining housing mix and community sustainability in conflict with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H6Policy P10Policy T2Saved Policy GP5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

187 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266010414
    Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266010413
    84 – 90 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266011827
    2 Rookwood Avenue, Osmondthorpe, Leeds, LS9 0NW
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010211
    22 Ecclesburn Street, Richmond Hill, Leeds, LS9 9DB
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266010755
    Land at The Beck and Call, Stainbeck Road, Leeds, LS7 2NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.