Planning appeal decision
Field 1659, Rhodes Lane, Clifford, Wetherby, Leeds, LS23 6LQ
Planning appeal 3357196 at Field 1659, Rhodes Lane, Clifford, Wetherby, Leeds, LS23 6LQ (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 3 April 2025 by Inspector Martinson P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt.
‘Revised proposals change of use of field to form dog walking and training area; associated works including new fencing, parking and access associated with existing kennel/boarding business (Retrospective)’
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Martinson P
- Postcode
- LS23 6LQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm and loss of openness, which is not clearly outweighed by the modest economic, recreational and biodiversity benefits of the scheme.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy N33
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 187Paragraph 116
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®