Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20253357208

2C Cleveland Street, Kempston, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK42 8DN

Planning appeal 3357208 at 2C Cleveland Street, Kempston, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK42 8DN (Bedford Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 April 2025 by Inspector Spataru A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants with regard to outlook, odour, natural ventilation and noise.

the change of use from nail salon (sui generis) to residential flat (class C3) (amended proposal)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Spataru A
Postcode
MK42 8DN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants with regard to outlook, odour, natural ventilation and noise
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 2B Cleveland Street with regard to odour

What decided it

The inadequate outlook and increased odour from the proposed bin storage arrangement would cause significant harm to the living conditions of both future occupants and neighbouring residents, which substantially and demonstrably outweighs the limited housing and economic benefits.

The significant harm to living conditions substantially and demonstrably outweighs the limited social and economic benefits of one additional studio flat, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 2SPolicy 32
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135Paragraph 232Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

96 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bedford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266011784
    1 Wood Road, Harrold, Bedford, MK43 7BS
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266013304
    11 Earls Holme, Bedford, MK42 8PG
  3. Allowed15 October 20266011978
    26 Becher Close, Renhold, MK41 0LP
  4. Allowed23 September 20263364376
    44 Portway , Great Denham , Bedford , MK40 4GB
  5. Allowed21 September 20263373400
    14 Woodman Way, Wootton, Bedford, MK43 9RX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.