Planning appeal decision
43 Ings Lane, Guiseley, Leeds, LS20 8BY
Planning appeal 3357930 at 43 Ings Lane, Guiseley, Leeds, LS20 8BY (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 16 June 2025 by Inspector Francis M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt; and the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
the repair and conversion of farmhouse, attached barn and outbuildings into two dwellings, demolition of existing Dutch barn, alterations to detached outbuilding and construction of three new dwellings and associated covered car parking
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Francis M
- Postcode
- LS20 8BY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt; and the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Guiseley Conservation Area
- whether other considerations clearly outweigh any harm to the Green Belt and any other harm so as to amount to the very special circumstances
What decided it
The significant harm to the Green Belt from the inappropriate new dwellings was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations put forward, so very special circumstances did not exist.
the significant harm to the Green Belt, combined with harm to the NDHA and less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery, heritage restoration, BNG, footpath improvements and viability arguments, so very special circumstances did not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- UDP Policy N33UDP Policy GB4UDP Policy N19CS Policy P10CS Policy P11CS Policy EN1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215Paragraph 216
- Judgments
- Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) v Selby DC [2015] EWCA Civ 1107; Vistry Homes Ltd and Fairfax Acquisitions Ltd v SSLUHC [2024] EWHC 2088 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®