Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 June 20253358469

70 Downs Valley Road, Saltdean, Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 6RF

demolition of existing house's side extension and replacement of conservatory with single story rear extension. Subdivision of site and erection of a new dwellinghouse in the rear garden with associated landscaping

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Coles C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of 68 and 72 Downs Valley Road with specific reference to outlook from the rear gardens
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of 70 Downs Valley Road with specific reference to privacy

What decided it

The adverse impacts on the character and appearance of the area and on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing provision and sustainability features, such that the proposal does not constitute sustainable development under the Framework.

The adverse impacts on character and appearance and neighbouring living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest benefits of housing provision, local economic benefits during construction and lifetime spending, and sustainability and biodiversity features, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CP12, Policy CP19, Policy DM18, Policy DM20, Policy DM44, Policy CP8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.