Planning appeal decision
East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG
Planning appeal 6014224 at East House, Preston Park Avenue, Brighton, BN1 6HG (Brighton and Hove City Council) was allowed on 26 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
a single storey rear extension
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Postcode
- BN1 6HG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
This decision was issued in the last week. We have picked out what decided it and the planning balance. They are in the app now, beside the letter.
See them with an accountWhat the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP12Policy CP15Policy DM21Policy DM26
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed6 October 2026601154116 and 16a, Richmond Road, Brighton, BN2 3RN
- Dismissed15 September 2026600726623-24, Brunswick Square, Hove, BN3 1EJ
- Dismissed26 August 2026600958610 Windlesham Road, Brighton & Hove, Brighton, BN1 3AG
- Notice varied and upheld12 August 202633569778 Queens Gardens, Brighton, BN1 4AR
- Dismissed3 August 20266006502Albion Court, 44 - 47 George Street, Brighton, BN2 1RJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®