Planning appeal decision
Land to the North of Wood Lane and East of Cragg Hill Farm, Horsforth, Leeds, LS18 4PF
Planning appeal 3359261 at Land to the North of Wood Lane and East of Cragg Hill Farm, Horsforth, Leeds, LS18 4PF (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 22 October 2025 by Inspector Taylor K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal proposal would affect the character and appearance of the area and whether it would preserve or enhance the Horsforth Cragg Hill and Woodside Conservation Area, including the impact on trees.
erection of up to 9 dwellings and construction of access
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Taylor K
- Postcode
- LS18 4PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal proposal would affect the character and appearance of the area and whether it would preserve or enhance the Horsforth Cragg Hill and Woodside Conservation Area, including the impact on trees
- The effect on biodiversity and protected species
- Highway safety
- Whether it would constitute an acceptable form of development
What decided it
The cumulative impact of harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, protected trees, biodiversity and protected species, and highway safety, which together significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply and economic activity.
The moderate benefits of housing supply, construction opportunities and local economic contribution were outweighed by the significant harm to the conservation area, trees, biodiversity and protected species, and highway safety concerns, with the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H2Policy P10Policy P11Policy G2Policy G8Policy G9Policy T2Policy N19Policy LD1Policy GP5Policy N24Policy BE1Policy Land 2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 30Paragraph 61Paragraph 115Paragraph 193Paragraph 215
- Judgments
- Kay, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Housing Communities and Local Government & Anor [2020] EWHC 2292 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed27 October 20266012772Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
- Dismissed20 October 20266012588Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
- Dismissed19 October 202660120225 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
- Dismissed16 October 20266010100Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
- Dismissed15 October 20266010414Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®