Planning appeal decision
Springfield Lodge, Bunwell Hill, Bunwell, Norfolk, NR16 1RZ
Planning appeal 3361161 at Springfield Lodge, Bunwell Hill, Bunwell, Norfolk, NR16 1RZ (South Norfolk District Council) was dismissed on 24 September 2025 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area.
one detached dwelling
- Authority
- South Norfolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Dyer I
- Postcode
- NR16 1RZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area
- Whether the site is a suitable location for a dwelling, having regard to local policy for the provision of housing, with particular reference to access to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposal on Protected Sites
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of Springfield Lodge, with particular reference to privacy
What decided it
The proposal would adversely affect the integrity of European protected sites through nutrient pollution without adequate long-term mitigation, which provides a strong reason for refusal that engages the exception to the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The moderate benefits of delivering a self-build dwelling to address housing land supply shortfall and self-build underdelivery were outweighed by the moderate harm to character and appearance, the unsustainable location requiring private car dependence, and the unmitigated harm to internationally important habitats.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM1.3Policy DM1.4Policy DM3.5Policy DM3.8Policy DM3.10Policy DM4.4Policy DM4.5Policy 2Policy 3Policy 7.5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State [2011] EWCA Civ 639
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Norfolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed12 October 20266010930Land East of Darnell House, Church Lane, Hethel, NR14 8HF
- Dismissed29 September 20266008791Land West Of The Old Hall, Watton Road, Colney, NR4 7TX
- Allowed25 September 20266004780Land Off Alburgh Road, Hempnall, Norwich, NR15 2NS
- Dismissed24 September 20266010418Land South of Darlifields, Heywood Road, Tibenham, NR16 1PB
- Dismissed5 August 20266005304Land East Of Low Road, Tasburgh, Norwich, NR15 2AR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®