®Planning appeal decision
24 Moseley Wood Gardens, Cookridge, LEEDS, LS16 7HR
removal of existing car port and garage and erection of single storey front, side and rear extension
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Mayes C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the property and surrounding area
What decided it
The proposed extension would disrupt the marked balance and rhythm of the paired semi-detached houses and surrounding area through its visual coalescence with the front elevation and continuous roofline, resulting in harmful effects on character and appearance that conflict with the development plan.
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy, September 2019, Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan, reviewed 2006, Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan, reviewed 2006, Policy HDG1 of the Council's Householder Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document, 2012
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.