Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 December 20253362257

Public Highway Adjacent to 21 Mare Street, London, E8 4RP

Planning appeal 3362257 at Public Highway Adjacent to 21 Mare Street, London, E8 4RP (London Borough of Hackney) was dismissed on 17 December 2025 by Inspector Storey P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed advertisement on visual amenity, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area.

free-standing advertising CIP unit featuring double-sided digital displays measuring 1635mm (H) x 924mm (W) to replace existing/recently removed free-standing advertising CIP unit featuring double-sided internally illuminated 6-sheet displays

Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Storey P
Postcode
E8 4RP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed advertisement on visual amenity, including whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area
  • public safety, with specific regard to pedestrian and highway safety

What decided it

The cumulative harm to visual amenity and the character of the Conservation Area, combined with the physical intrusion into an already constrained footway compromising pedestrian safety, outweighed the appellant's arguments regarding replacement of previous advertising and compliance with modern standards.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4Policy D8Policy HC1Policy LP1Policy LP3Policy LP7Policy PP1Policy LP42
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 141Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 793 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hackney

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed6 August 20266010979
    Pavement O/S 383-385 Mare Street, London, E8 1HY
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266010978
    Pavement O/S 383-385 Mare Street, London, E8 1HY
  3. Dismissed20 July 20263375079
    Kebab Zero, 2 Kingsland Road, London, E2 8DA
  4. Dismissed9 July 20266004008
    42 Great Eastern Street, Hackney, London, EC2A3EP
  5. Dismissed26 March 20266003394
    360 Old Street, Hackney, London, EC1V 9LT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.