Planning appeal decision
Cragg Royd, Woodlands Drive, Rawdon, Leeds, LS19 6JZ
Planning appeal 3362302 at Cragg Royd, Woodlands Drive, Rawdon, Leeds, LS19 6JZ (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 12 August 2025 by Inspector Clark J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies and its effect on openness.
a detached double garage with car port
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Clark J
- Postcode
- LS19 6JZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies and its effect on openness
- whether the character or appearance of the Rawdon – Cragg Wood Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The harm to the designated heritage asset of the Conservation Area, which carries significant weight and is not outweighed by any public benefits, makes the proposal unacceptable despite the absence of Green Belt harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- UDP Policy N33Householder Design SPD Policy HDG3Core Strategy Policy P11UDP Policy N19Rawdon Neighbourhood Development Plan Policy R6 a)Core Strategy Policy P10UDP Policy BC7UDP Policy BD6SPD Policy HDG1UDP Policy GP5UDP Policy N37
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®