Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 August 20253362878

Fairview, 231 Hall Lane, Horsforth, United Kingdom, LS18 5EG

‘construction of detached garage with attached car port; sliding gate to existing vehicular access, new pedestrian access with gate to existing stone boundary wall; new stone wall with pedestrian gate within site.’

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Manson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the development on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area by presenting as an unduly dominant and visually assertive feature that undermines the host dwelling's design quality, contrary to the development plan.

Framework references: 116

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Core Strategy Selective Review Leeds Local Plan (2019), Policy GP5 of Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review) (2006), Policy T2 of the Core Strategy

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.