Planning appeal decision
Land Adj Bertha Bloggs Cottage, Kings Street, Huntsworth, NR24 2EH
Planning appeal 3362900 at Land Adj Bertha Bloggs Cottage, Kings Street, Huntsworth, NR24 2EH (North Norfolk District Council) was dismissed on 24 July 2025 by Inspector Chamberlain G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with particular reference to the spatial strategy in the development plan, the accessibility of services and facilities and policies concerned with development in areas at risk of flooding.
‘four new dwelling houses in traditional Norfolk vernacular style’
- Authority
- North Norfolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Chamberlain G
- Postcode
- NR24 2EH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with particular reference to the spatial strategy in the development plan, the accessibility of services and facilities and policies concerned with development in areas at risk of flooding
- Whether the proposed development would incorporate an adequate mix of dwellings
- The effect of the proposed development on the significance of the Hunworth and Glaven Valley Conservation Areas
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of Riverbank and the future occupants of Plot 3, with particular reference to privacy
- Whether adequate information has been submitted to consider the effects of the proposed development on biodiversity
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular reference to parking
What decided it
The cumulative harm from conflicts with the spatial strategy, flood risk policies, conservation area protection, housing mix requirements, and privacy concerns, combined with the absence of sufficient public benefits to outweigh these harms, justified dismissal.
The modest public benefits of housing delivery during a five-year supply shortfall and economic benefits were outweighed by the great weight afforded to conservation area harm, the conflicts with the spatial strategy and flood risk policies, and the other identified harms.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SS2Policy SS4Policy CT5Policy EN10Policy EN2Policy EN4Policy EN8Policy HO1Policy EN9Policy CT6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 63Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 135Paragraph 173Paragraph 174Paragraph 175Paragraph 187Paragraph 192
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Norfolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed15 October 20266012084Hall Farm Barns, Station Road, Thorpe Market, NR11 8UD
- Dismissed22 September 20266008881The Old Post House, Mundesley Road, Trimingham, NR11 8DZ
- Dismissed29 January 20263370351Sharrington Strawberries , Melton Constable , NR24 2PH
- Allowed1 September 20253356340Smallburgh Hall, Hall Drive, Smallburgh, Norfolk, NR12 9FW
- Dismissed1 August 20253364842Lilac Cottage , Knapton Road , North Walsham , Norfolk, Nr28 0RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®