Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 June 20253363272

269 Whitehall Road, Drighlington, Leeds, BD11 1BH

a detached house to vacant land without complying with a condition attached to planning permission reference 14/01882/FU

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hartley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether condition No. 14 of planning permission 14/01882/FU is necessary in so far as protecting the living conditions of the occupiers of adjoining properties, as well as in terms of ensuring that the dwelling continues to be appropriately designed, and to assimilate well and sympathetically into the character and appearance of the area having regard to local and national planning policies

What decided it

The condition is necessary to maintain appropriate control over potential extensions and outbuildings that could harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through loss of outlook, light or privacy, and to preserve the spacious character and design synergy of the locality.

Framework references: 55, 57, 12

Plan policies cited: Leeds Core Strategy 2014 (amended 2019) Policy P10, Leeds Core Strategy 2014 (amended 2019) Policy P12, Leeds UDP Review 2006 Policy GP5, Leeds UDP Review 2006 Policy BD5, SPG13 Neighbourhoods for Living: A Guide for Residential Design in Leeds

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.