Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 September 20253363532

78 Wold Road, HULL, HU5 5UW

replacement of existing hipped roof on main dwelling with new hipped roof (increase in existing ridge height from max. 7.4m to max. 8.15m high), erection of two storey extension to rear with hipped roof (max 4m long x 6m wide x max 8.15m high) and erection of single storey side extension (2m wide x 6.185m long x max 4.27m high) (Amended plans received)

Authority
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hartley S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of No.80 Wold Road in respect of outlook and light

What decided it

The two storey rear extension would constitute a dominant and out of proportion addition when viewed from County Road South, failing to assimilate appropriately into the surrounding environment and causing unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area.

Plan policies cited: Policy 14, Policy 22, Hull Local Plan 2016-2032, SPD 1: Designing a House Extension

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.