Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 September 20253363595

3 Hedgemans Road, Dagenham, RM9 6HA

Planning appeal 3363595 at 3 Hedgemans Road, Dagenham, RM9 6HA (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 1 September 2025 by Inspector Carpenter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular reference to room sizes.

Proposing to authorise use of existing C4 class HMO Property with internal modifications to maximise the property’s potential as a HMO suitable for more than 6 people and thus change the class to Sui Generis”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Carpenter C
Postcode
RM9 6HA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with particular reference to room sizes
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular reference to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular reference to parking

What decided it

The proposal failed to demonstrate adequate living conditions for future occupiers due to insufficient room sizes, would cause material harm to neighbouring occupiers through noise and disturbance, and lacked sufficient evidence regarding parking and highway safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMH5Policy D6Policy D4Policy SP2Policy DMD1Policy GG3Policy D14Policy T1Policy T6Policy T6.1Policy DMT1Policy DMT2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

309 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed8 May 20266002379
    33 Sandown Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 8XD
  2. Dismissed13 April 20266002839
    22 Whitebarn Lane, Dagenham, RM10 9LH
  3. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  4. Dismissed27 March 20263370715
    82 Holgate Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 8NB
  5. Notice varied and upheld27 March 20263340354
    197 Broad Street, Dagenham, RM10 9JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.