Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 September 20253363616

Glenwood Harthall Lane, KINGS LANGLEY, WD4 8JN

demolition of existing dwelling, construction of two new detached dwellings

Authority
Three Rivers District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Leigh C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposals would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework, including consideration of openness effects
  • the effect on character and appearance
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal in the Green Belt

What decided it

The proposals constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and moderate harm to character and appearance, which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations including the modest contribution to housing supply and fallback schemes.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, together with moderate harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by other considerations including limited weight for fallback positions and limited weight for housing supply contribution, so very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 154, 155, 110, 115, 12

Plan policies cited: Policy CP2, Policy DM2, Policy CP1, Policy CP12, Policy DM1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.