Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 September 20253363700

Land Adjacent to Floss & Smile Dental Practice, Tring Road, Eaton Bray, Dunstable, Bedfordshire, LU6 2FW

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Sylvester G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the appeal development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework and any effects on Green Belt openness and its purposes
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area including the landscape and scenic beauty of the Chilterns National Landscape
  • Whether the development is in a suitable location having particular regard to its accessibility and relevant development plan policies
  • If the appeal development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it

What decided it

The substantial weight given to the harm to Green Belt openness and the purpose of safeguarding the countryside from encroachment, combined with moderate harm to landscape character and the setting of the Chilterns National Landscape, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, meaning very special circumstances did not exist to justify the development.

Framework references: 11, 88, 89, 135, 154, 187, 189

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy SP7, Policy HQ1, Policy EE5, Policy EE7, Policy EMP4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.