Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20253364374

North Wyke Farm, Guildford Road, Normandy, Guildford, GU3 2AN

Planning appeal 3364374 at North Wyke Farm, Guildford Road, Normandy, Guildford, GU3 2AN (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 August 2025 by Inspector Praine N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

Construction of a care home, 17 supported living units with staff accommodation and 10 one and two bedroom affordable homes

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
community-institutional · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Praine N
Postcode
GU3 2AN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area including trees
  • The effect of the development on highway safety and capacity
  • The effect of the development on surface water flooding and drainage
  • The effect of the development on protected species, habitat and whether it could provide biodiversity net gain
  • The Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area and planning obligations
  • Whether the proposed development is appropriately sustainable in relation to climate change, sustainable design, construction, and energy
  • If the development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations that amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The harm by reason of inappropriateness to the Green Belt and impact on openness, combined with substantial harm to character and appearance, highway safety, drainage, protected species, and the SPA, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits so as to constitute very special circumstances.

The substantial and very substantial harms (Green Belt inappropriateness, openness, character and appearance, highway safety, drainage, protected species, SPA) were not clearly outweighed by the significant positive benefits (care bedspaces, economic benefits, social and environmental benefits), therefore very special circumstances were not established.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2Policy H1Policy D1Policy D4Policy ID3Policy P4Policy ID4Policy P6Policy P7Policy D2Policy P5Policy H2Policy ID1saved Policy NRM6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142Paragraph 153Paragraph 156Paragraph 175Paragraph 181Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

41 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.