Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 October 20253364782

Talina Centre, 23A Bagley's Lane, London, SW6 2BW

Planning appeal 3364782 at Talina Centre, 23A Bagley's Lane, London, SW6 2BW (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 29 October 2025 by Inspector Armstrong N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the condition is necessary and reasonable to fully consider the effects of a proposal on the amount of land available for industrial, commercial and employment use.

use of the industrial units to allow flexible uses of the units within Classes B8/E(e)/E(g) without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 2023/02158/FUL, dated 19 April 2024

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
Armstrong N
Postcode
SW6 2BW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the condition is necessary and reasonable to fully consider the effects of a proposal on the amount of land available for industrial, commercial and employment use
  • whether the condition is necessary and reasonable to fully consider the effects of a proposal on the living conditions of potential future occupiers of residential use

What decided it

The condition is necessary and reasonable to safeguard the continued use of the light industrial estate as commercial premises and to ensure sufficient land remains available for industrial, commercial and employment use in accordance with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy E1Policy E2Policy CC11Policy HO4Policy HO11Policy D13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 55Paragraph 200

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

772 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds18 September 20263355656
    Unit 1D, Woodstock Studios, 36 Woodstock Grove, London, W12 8LE
  2. Dismissed21 August 20266010167
    15 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  3. Dismissed21 August 20266010163
    13 Galena Road, London, W6 0LT
  4. Dismissed30 January 20263374073
    8 Disbrowe Rd, London, W6 8QF
  5. Dismissed29 January 20263375215
    Shepherd And Flock 84 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.