®Planning appeal decision
111 Hillcrest Rise, LEEDS, LS16 7DJ
described on the planning application form as “Combined application for rear and side extensions v1, v2, and v3; believed to be individually permitted development ”
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cross D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Effect of the proposal on the living conditions of residents of Nos 109 and 113 with regards to outlook, light and privacy
- Character and appearance of the host dwelling and the streetscene
What decided it
The significant harm to the living conditions of neighbouring residents through loss of outlook and light, combined with the harm to character and appearance caused by the side extension, outweighed any other considerations.
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy 2014, Saved Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy HDG1 of the Householder Design Guide 2012
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.