Planning appeal decision
Payphone outside 44 Baker Street, London, W1M 1DH
- Authority
- City of Westminster Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- utilities-energy · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Storey P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary having regard to amenity, in the case of all conditions except No 4
- Whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary having regard to public safety, in the case of condition Nos 3 and 4 only
What decided it
The conditions failed to distinguish between the advertisement display (regulated separately under advertisement consent) and the interactive touchscreen (subject to planning control), and the Council provided no site-specific evidence or planning-specific harm to justify most of the disputed conditions.
Plan policies cited: Policy 24, Policy 25, Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 43
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®