Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed17 February 20263365431

Payphone outside 44 Baker Street, London, W1M 1DH

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Storey P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary having regard to amenity, in the case of all conditions except No 4
  • Whether the disputed conditions are reasonable and necessary having regard to public safety, in the case of condition Nos 3 and 4 only

What decided it

The conditions failed to distinguish between the advertisement display (regulated separately under advertisement consent) and the interactive touchscreen (subject to planning control), and the Council provided no site-specific evidence or planning-specific harm to justify most of the disputed conditions.

Plan policies cited: Policy 24, Policy 25, Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 43

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.