Planning appeal decision
Former Oakhill Lodge, Roundhay Park Lane, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS17 8AR
Planning appeal 3365549 at Former Oakhill Lodge, Roundhay Park Lane, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS17 8AR (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 5 August 2025 by Inspector Eggleton P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would amount to inappropriate development within the Green Belt.
New dwelling to replace previously demolished Lodge, including creation of new access to serve existing Oakhill Estate, new boundary wall, repositioned gateposts, landscaping and associated works
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Eggleton P
- Postcode
- LS17 8AR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would amount to inappropriate development within the Green Belt
- Whether there would be any other harm to the Green Belt
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The council's demonstrated 6.6-year housing land supply means the proposal cannot satisfy the demonstrable unmet need requirement of NPPF paragraph 155, and combined with the significant harm to Green Belt openness and character, the benefits do not clearly outweigh the harm.
The benefits of improved access, housing delivery, biodiversity enhancements, use of previously developed land, and family circumstances do not clearly outweigh the harm from inappropriateness, significant reduction in openness, and detraction from character and appearance of the countryside.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006)Policy P12 of the Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Review 2019)Policy P10 of the Core StrategyPolicy H2 of the Core Strategy
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 110Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®