Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 January 20263366217

29 Piercing Hill, Theydon Bois, EPPING, CM16 7JW

demolition of existing side extensions and garage, construction of two- storey side and rear extensions and creation of basement

Authority
Epping Forest District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Sabu R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the significance of the host building as a non-designated heritage asset and the setting of nearby non-designated heritage assets
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would substantially harm its openness and would harm the significance of a non-designated heritage asset, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify approval.

Framework references: 154, 155

Plan policies cited: DM7, DM9, DM4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.