Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 November 20253366275

Land to the West of Elm Farm Crouch Lane, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, EN7 6TH

Planning appeal 3366275 at Land to the West of Elm Farm Crouch Lane, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, Broxbourne, Hertfordshire, EN7 6TH (Broxbourne Borough Council) was dismissed on 4 November 2025 by Inspector Tinsley F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

‘Proposed development of a single detached house with associated access and parking.’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Tinsley F
Postcode
EN7 6TH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety with regard to the proposed site access arrangements
  • the effect of the proposed development on setting of Elm Farm and Elm Farm Garage, both of which are Grade II Listed Buildings
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no exception applying, and the limited positive considerations advanced do not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, meaning very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GB1Policy TM2Policy TM4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

82 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broxbourne

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed12 October 20266008417
    Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL
  2. Allowed10 June 20266003616
    Land at Goffs Oak Gospel Hall, East of Newgatestreet Road, Goffs Oak, EN7 5RU
  3. Split Decision4 November 20253339195
    Flopsy Wood Community Project Cic, Cock Lane, Hoddesdon, EN11 8LS
  4. Allowed9 October 20253366662
    Land to the Rear of 21 to 32 Doverfield, Goffs Oak, Waltham Cross, EN7 5EL
  5. Allowed23 September 20253368131
    Land North of Pylon Farm, St James Road, Cheshunt, Herts, EN7 6TR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.