Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 October 20253366614

25 Papercourt Lane, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DS

Planning appeal 3366614 at 25 Papercourt Lane, Ripley, Woking, GU23 6DS (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 30 October 2025 by Inspector Coles C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site represents a suitable location for housing having regard to its accessibility to services and facilities.

custom/self-build dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Coles C
Postcode
GU23 6DS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site represents a suitable location for housing having regard to its accessibility to services and facilities

What decided it

The site's rural location and heavy reliance on private motor vehicles for access to services and facilities, contrary to Framework paragraphs 105-117 and Policy ID3, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefit of one dwelling in an area with no five-year housing land supply.

The adverse impacts of the unsuitable rural location and conflict with sustainable transport policies significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefit of one dwelling contribution to housing supply, such that the proposal would not constitute sustainable development and the presumption in favour did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ID3 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan: Strategy and Sites 2015-2034
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 105Paragraph 106Paragraph 107Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 112Paragraph 115Paragraph 116Paragraph 117Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

51 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  3. Dismissed21 September 20266007054
    2 Chantry View Road, Guildford, GU1 3XR
  4. Allowed17 September 20266011786
    Tylers Croft, Abbotswood Close, Guildford, GU1 1XA
  5. Dismissed9 July 20266008466
    Little Pantiles, Surrey, GU5 9QF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.