Planning appeal decision
Little Pantiles, Surrey, GU5 9QF
Planning appeal 6008466 at Little Pantiles, Surrey, GU5 9QF (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 July 2026 by Inspector H Miles, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.
erection of a self-build dwelling following demolition of ancillary cottage, garage and workshop and removal of in-ground pool
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- H Miles
- Postcode
- GU5 9QF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area including with regard to the Surrey Hills National Landscape
- Whether the development would promote sustainable transport modes
- The quality of living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to outlook
- The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity with particular regard to trees
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the serious harm to the character and appearance of the nationally important Surrey Hills National Landscape, combined with unacceptable living conditions, unsustainable transport patterns, and biodiversity harm, are not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial and serious harms to the Green Belt, openness, and National Landscape character, together with unacceptable living conditions, unsustainable transport, and biodiversity harm, are not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision; the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) does not apply because Green Belt and National Landscape policies provide a strong reason for refusal under footnote 7.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P2Policy P1Policy ID3Policy D5Policy D4Policy P6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 11Paragraph 7
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
- Allowed14 October 20266009751Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
- Dismissed6 October 20266009810Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
- Allowed5 October 20266012736The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
- Dismissed23 September 20266009962Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®