Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 July 20266008466

Little Pantiles, Surrey, GU5 9QF

Planning appeal 6008466 at Little Pantiles, Surrey, GU5 9QF (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 July 2026 by Inspector H Miles, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.

erection of a self-build dwelling following demolition of ancillary cottage, garage and workshop and removal of in-ground pool

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
H Miles
Postcode
GU5 9QF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and any relevant development plan policies including the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area including with regard to the Surrey Hills National Landscape
  • Whether the development would promote sustainable transport modes
  • The quality of living conditions for future occupiers with particular regard to outlook
  • The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity with particular regard to trees
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the serious harm to the character and appearance of the nationally important Surrey Hills National Landscape, combined with unacceptable living conditions, unsustainable transport patterns, and biodiversity harm, are not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

The substantial and serious harms to the Green Belt, openness, and National Landscape character, together with unacceptable living conditions, unsustainable transport, and biodiversity harm, are not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision; the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) does not apply because Green Belt and National Landscape policies provide a strong reason for refusal under footnote 7.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P2Policy P1Policy ID3Policy D5Policy D4Policy P6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154Paragraph 11Paragraph 7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

65 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
  2. Allowed14 October 20266009751
    Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266009810
    Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
  4. Allowed5 October 20266012736
    The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
  5. Dismissed23 September 20266009962
    Pentire, The Avenue, Worplesdon, GU3 3RA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.