Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 October 20253367201

David James Motor Co., 154 High Road, Romford, RM6 6NT

Planning appeal 3367201 at David James Motor Co., 154 High Road, Romford, RM6 6NT (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 9 October 2025 by Inspector Marriott H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance.

for the change of use of forecourt from car sales to hand car wash including the installation of perspex screen to the front of the site

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Marriott H
Postcode
RM6 6NT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety and parking

What decided it

The lack of certainty that proposed noise mitigation measures would achieve acceptable levels for neighbouring residents, combined with unresolved highway safety and parking concerns, meant the proposal conflicted with development plan policies and could not be justified.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D13Policy D14Policy DMD1Policy DMSI3Policy T4Policy DMT1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 115Paragraph 116

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

320 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed8 May 20266002379
    33 Sandown Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 8XD
  2. Dismissed13 April 20266002839
    22 Whitebarn Lane, Dagenham, RM10 9LH
  3. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  4. Dismissed27 March 20263370715
    82 Holgate Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 8NB
  5. Notice varied and upheld27 March 20263340354
    197 Broad Street, Dagenham, RM10 9JD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.