Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 October 20253367228

Land And Buildings South West Of Moorland Grange Farm , Otley Road, Eldwick, West Yorkshire, BD16 3LX

Planning appeal 3367228 at Land And Buildings South West Of Moorland Grange Farm , Otley Road, Eldwick, West Yorkshire, BD16 3LX (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 17 October 2025 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the South Pennine Moors Special Protection Area (SPA) and Special Area of Conservation (SAC).

Outline application for residential development of land for 5 dwellings with approval sought for scale, layout, appearance and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Williams K
Postcode
BD16 3LX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the South Pennine Moors Special Protection Area (SPA) and Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for Biodiversity Net Gain
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The absence of a secured mitigation mechanism (s.106 obligation) to address the likely significant effect on the SPA and SAC integrity, combined with substantial harm to Green Belt openness and character and appearance, which together are not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing supply and economic contribution.

The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt, SPA/SAC and character and appearance of the area was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight of benefits comprising housing supply contribution, economic benefits and biodiversity net gain, therefore very special circumstances do not exist to justify the inappropriate development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SC8Policy EN4Policy DS1Policy DS2Policy DS3Policy HO9Policy EN2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 15Paragraph 73Paragraph 110Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 194
Judgments
Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Mead Realisations Ltd v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2025] EWCA Civ 3

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013460
    Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012872
    Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266008465
    Land at Moorhouse Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9RY
  4. Allowed10 August 20266002654
    Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ
  5. Dismissed20 July 20266008285
    Ghyll Clough Farm, Slaymaker Lane, Oakworth, Bradford, BD22 7EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.