Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 November 20253367759

Penny Lane Bungalow Carlton Lane, East Carlton, Yeadon, Leeds, LS19 7BG

Planning appeal 3367759 at Penny Lane Bungalow Carlton Lane, East Carlton, Yeadon, Leeds, LS19 7BG (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 5 November 2025 by Inspector Cross D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with due regard to openness.

retrospective application for erection of two storey outbuilding forming double garage and first floor store, raised platform, steps and container storage to rear

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Cross D
Postcode
LS19 7BG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with due regard to openness
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the host property and the area
  • The effect on protected trees

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to character and appearance arising from the building's clumsy top-heavy design, awkward scale and massing, combined with unacceptable harm to protected trees through proximity to their root protection areas, outweighed the conclusion that the proposal was not inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P10 Core Strategy 2019Policy P12 Core Strategy 2019Policy G9 Core Strategy 2019Saved Policy GP5 UDPSaved Policy N33 UDPPolicy LAND2 Natural Resources and Waste DPDPolicy HDG1 Householder Design Guide 2012Policy HDG3 Householder Design Guide 2012
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

20 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed13 October 20266011132
    Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
  2. Dismissed12 October 20266011503
    Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266009680
    The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
  4. Allowed12 August 20266005793
    Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
  5. Dismissed24 July 20266006233
    Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.