Planning appeal decision
Old Farm , Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8JW
Planning appeal 3368051 at Old Farm , Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, WD4 8JW (Three Rivers District Council) was dismissed on 2 October 2025 by Inspector Bowden N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies including the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
Two storey extension, new swimming pool and patio area, new single storey detached annexe, conversion and extension of existing detached garage into office, gym, study area and pool room with shower, new 1.8 metre high entrance gates, new hard surface access point in rear garden to provide access to new detached single storey chicken coop
- Authority
- Three Rivers District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Bowden N
- Postcode
- WD4 8JW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies including the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing host dwelling and the area including whether the existing dwelling may be regarded as a Non-Designated Heritage Asset
- The effect of the proposed development on trees
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposed development represents disproportionate additions to the original dwelling that fail to preserve the openness of the Green Belt and would cause significant harm to the Non-Designated Heritage Asset, with no very special circumstances identified to outweigh these harms.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP11 of the Three Rivers Core Strategy 2011Policy CP12 of the Three Rivers Core Strategy 2011Policy CP1 of the Three Rivers Core Strategy 2011Policy DM2 of the Three Rivers Development Management Policies Local Development Document 2013Policy DM1 of the Three Rivers Development Management Policies Local Development Document 2013Policy DM3 of the Three Rivers Development Management Policies Local Development Document 2013Policy DM6 of the Three Rivers Development Management Policies Local Development Document 2013
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 216Paragraph 56
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Three Rivers
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed24 September 20266010198Rusper, Nottingham Road, Heronsgate, WD3 5DN
- Dismissed12 August 20266006827Land Adjacent to Sarratt Lane, Loudwater, WD3 4AS
- Dismissed30 June 20266004957Land Adjoining Westwood End, Bucks Hill, Kings Langley, WD4 9AS
- Dismissed8 June 20266005787Popes Croft, Chandlers Lane, Rickmansworth, WD3 4NE
- Dismissed16 April 20266001382Old Farm Harthall Lane, Kings Langley, Please Select, WD4 8JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®