Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 October 20253368977

20 Sparrow Green, Dagenham, RM10 7EU

Planning appeal 3368977 at 20 Sparrow Green, Dagenham, RM10 7EU (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 14 October 2025 by Inspector Heppell J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of 49, 51 and 53 Lawrence Crescent with particular reference to outlook and daylight.

two bedroom house, demolition of existing rear shed

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Heppell J
Postcode
RM10 7EU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of 49, 51 and 53 Lawrence Crescent with particular reference to outlook and daylight
  • the character and appearance of the area
  • on street parking and the highways network

What decided it

The loss of outlook and daylight to neighbouring properties would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the housing delivery benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

The moderate weight given to housing delivery benefits was outweighed by the significant and demonstrable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring properties through loss of outlook and daylight.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London Plan March 2021Policy DMD 1 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Local Plan 2020-2037Policy D4 of the London PlanPolicy SP2 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Local Plan 2020-2037Policy DMT 2 of the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Local Plan 2020-2037Policy T6.1 of the London PlanPolicy T1 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

320 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  2. Notice upheld17 March 20263332937
    56 Kings Avenue, Romford, RM6 6BB
  3. Notice upheld16 March 20263332931
    532 Becontree Avenue, Dagenham, RM8 3HR
  4. Dismissed12 March 20266001227
    8A Neville Gardens, Dagenham, RM8 3QT
  5. Dismissed27 February 20266001528
    65, Upney Lane, Barking, IG11 9LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.