Planning appeal decision
171-173 Frenches Road, Redhill, RH1 2HZ
Planning appeal 3369454 at 171-173 Frenches Road, Redhill, RH1 2HZ (Reigate and Banstead Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 January 2026 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area.
Outline application with all matters reserved for demolition of former rehabilitation centre and erection of new 3 storey supported housing block containing 11 self-contained C2 units, plus staff office
- Authority
- Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Szymanski D
- Postcode
- RH1 2HZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal upon the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 167 and 167A with reference to outlook and privacy
- whether or not the proposal could provide satisfactory living conditions for its future occupiers with reference to outlook and outdoor space provision
- the effect of the proposal upon protected species
- whether or not the proposal could make adequate provision for surface water drainage and avoid increasing flood risk
What decided it
The significant and demonstrable harm to character and appearance, which the Framework states should be refused, combined with unresolved protected species concerns and harm to future occupiers' living conditions, outweighed the benefits of housing supply and specialist accommodation provision.
The benefits of housing supply, specialist accommodation for disabled residents, economic benefits, and biodiversity net gain (attracting very significant, significant, moderate and moderate weight respectively) were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the high-order weight given to significant harm to character and appearance, unresolved protected species harm (very significant weight), and harm to living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers (significant and moderate weights).
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DES1Policy DES7Policy DES5Policy NHE2Policy CCF2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 135Paragraph 139Paragraph 192Paragraph 193Paragraph 182Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed10 December 202533736444 The Drive, Banstead, Surrey, SM7 1DB
- Allowed19 November 20253367630Land at Shawley Crescent , Epsom Downs , Surrey , KT18 5PQ
- Allowed30 September 20253361534181-183 Great Tattenhams, Epsom Downs, Surrey, KT18 5RA
- Allowed4 June 20253354590Banstead Cricket Club, Avenue Road, Banstead, Surrey, SM7 2PD
- Allowed12 May 20253354669296, 298 And Rear Of 300 Fir Tree Road , Epsom Downs , Surrey , KT17 3NN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®