Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 November 20253370701

340 Deansgate, Manchester, M3 4LY

Planning appeal 3370701 at 340 Deansgate, Manchester, M3 4LY (Manchester City Council) was dismissed on 13 November 2025 by Inspector Hughes L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed advertisement on the visual amenity of the area, with particular regard to the preservation or enhancement of the character or appearance of the Castlefield Conservation Area, and the setting of nearby listed buildings.

the installation of 1no. internally illuminated fascia sign, no.3 vinyl signs and 1no. internally illuminated projecting sign

Appeal type
advert · Advertisement Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Hughes L
Postcode
M3 4LY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed advertisement on the visual amenity of the area, with particular regard to the preservation or enhancement of the character or appearance of the Castlefield Conservation Area, and the setting of nearby listed buildings

What decided it

The proposed projecting sign would harm the visual amenity of the area and would not preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Castlefield Conservation Area or the settings of adjacent listed buildings, conflicting with relevant development plan policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Manchester Core Strategy Development Plan Document Policy SP1Manchester Core Strategy Development Plan Document Policy DM1Places for Everyone Joint Development Plan Document 2022 to 2039 Policy JP-P2Unitary Development Plan Saved Policy DC14

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

249 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Manchester City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed6 October 20266009176
    571 Oldham Road, Manchester, M40 5AF
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266005102
    Arndale Centre, Market Street, Manchester, M4 3AB
  3. Allowed7 September 20266010295
    Fountain Street, Outside No. 20, Manchester, M2 3AW
  4. Dismissed26 August 20266008236
    1 Goods Yard Street, Manchester, M3 3BG
  5. Dismissed13 July 20266009630
    Land at 1-11 Oldham Road, South West of Cable Street, Manchester, M4 5EQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.