Planning appeal decision
28 Raisins Hill, Eastcote, HA5 2BS
Planning appeal 3370880 at 28 Raisins Hill, Eastcote, HA5 2BS (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed on 19 June 2026 by Inspector Hawkins S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council's refusal to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the appellant has shown that the proposed works benefit from planning permission granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) at Article 3(1), Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B, C and D.
proposed loft conversion involving construction of a rear-facing dormer and 2 x side facing gables and front porch addition
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Hawkins S
- Postcode
- HA5 2BS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's refusal to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the appellant has shown that the proposed works benefit from planning permission granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) at Article 3(1), Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B, C and D
What decided it
The retention of more than half of the existing roof structure meant the proposed works constituted an addition or alteration to the roof rather than rebuilding, and therefore fell within the scope of permitted development under GPDO Classes B and C.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- Street v MHLG & Essex CC [1965] 193 EG 537; Larkin v Basildon DC [1980] JPL 407
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 202660153104 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
- Dismissed27 October 2026600985618-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
- Dismissed21 October 2026601178225 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266011268364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
- Allowed6 October 2026601385888 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®