Planning appeal decision
28 Raisins Hill, Eastcote, HA5 2BS
proposed loft conversion involving construction of a rear-facing dormer and 2 x side facing gables and front porch addition
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Hawkins S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's refusal to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the appellant has shown that the proposed works benefit from planning permission granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) at Article 3(1), Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B, C and D
What decided it
The retention of more than half of the existing roof structure meant the proposed works constituted an addition or alteration to the roof rather than rebuilding, and therefore fell within the scope of permitted development under GPDO Classes B and C.
Judgments cited: Street v MHLG & Essex CC [1965] 193 EG 537; Larkin v Basildon DC [1980] JPL 407
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®