Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 June 20263370880

28 Raisins Hill, Eastcote, HA5 2BS

proposed loft conversion involving construction of a rear-facing dormer and 2 x side facing gables and front porch addition

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's refusal to grant a certificate of lawful use or development was well-founded, turning on whether the appellant has shown that the proposed works benefit from planning permission granted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) at Article 3(1), Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes B, C and D

What decided it

The retention of more than half of the existing roof structure meant the proposed works constituted an addition or alteration to the roof rather than rebuilding, and therefore fell within the scope of permitted development under GPDO Classes B and C.

Judgments cited: Street v MHLG & Essex CC [1965] 193 EG 537; Larkin v Basildon DC [1980] JPL 407

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.