Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 December 20253371198

Land at Grid Ref 407225 449934, Main Street, Addingham, West Yorkshire, LS29 0PL

Planning appeal 3371198 at Land at Grid Ref 407225 449934, Main Street, Addingham, West Yorkshire, LS29 0PL (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 4 December 2025 by Inspector Brook S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in a Local Green Space.

‘Use of land as additional garden area to serve new dwelling originally permitted by planning ref. 22/05117/FUL and subsequently varied by Planning Refs 23/03429/VOC and 24/02803/VOC’

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Brook S
Postcode
LS29 0PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in a Local Green Space
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character or appearance of the Addingham Conservation Area, with particular regard to trees
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the provision of open space

What decided it

The modest but identifiable harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area through loss of visual amenity and risk to mature trees, combined with loss of Local Green Space provision, outweighed the very limited public benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ANDP11ANDP2EN1EN3EN5ANDP4ANDP5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 108Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 104Paragraph 215Paragraph 212

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

21 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013460
    Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012872
    Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266008465
    Land at Moorhouse Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9RY
  4. Allowed10 August 20266002654
    Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ
  5. Dismissed20 July 20266008285
    Ghyll Clough Farm, Slaymaker Lane, Oakworth, Bradford, BD22 7EH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.