Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision20 October 20253371386

7 Stonedene, Meanwood, Leeds, LS6 4NU

Planning appeal 3371386 at 7 Stonedene, Meanwood, Leeds, LS6 4NU (Leeds City Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 20 October 2025 by Inspector Pipe C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed single storey extension to side and rear, including enlarged window to side, and demolition of the existing conservatory on the living conditions of occupiers of No. 6 Stonedene.

single storey extension to side and rear, including enlarged window to side; part garage conversion to habitable room including new door to rear and window to side; demolition of existing conservatory

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pipe C
Postcode
LS6 4NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed single storey extension to side and rear, including enlarged window to side, and demolition of the existing conservatory on the living conditions of occupiers of No. 6 Stonedene

What decided it

The proposed extension would create an overbearing and dominant built form that would significantly harm the living conditions and outlook of occupiers of the neighbouring property No. 6 Stonedene.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P10 of the Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review 2019)Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (2006)Policy HDG2 of the Leeds City Council, Householder Design Guide, Supplementary Planning Document (2012)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

108 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012772
    Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012588
    Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266012022
    5 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266010100
    Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266010414
    Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.