Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 December 20253371987

Oban House, Thorpe Lane , Tingley, WF3 1QY

Planning appeal 3371987 at Oban House, Thorpe Lane , Tingley, WF3 1QY (Leeds City Council) was allowed on 24 December 2025 by Inspector Mayes C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt.

alterations to front boundary

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Mayes C
Postcode
WF3 1QY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether or not any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other identified harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The specific personal circumstances of the appellant and their immediate family, supported by professional medical evidence demonstrating a clear and compelling need for enhanced boundary treatment, clearly outweighed the harm to the Green Belt and character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy N33Policy P10Policy P12Policy GP5Policy BD6Policy N25
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

39 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed13 October 20266011132
    Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
  2. Dismissed12 October 20266011503
    Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266009680
    The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
  4. Allowed12 August 20266005793
    Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
  5. Dismissed24 July 20266006233
    Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.